Stephen Miller is struggling with the definition and actions taken within a democracy. He seems unable to understand that eighty-one million people voted for Biden, seven million more than Trump, with the precise expectation that Biden would, in fact, erase the stain that was the Trump administration. Stephen Miller was the architect of the child separation policy, he needs to understand that the world found the policy abhorrent, quite possibly a crime against humanity. Yet, he thinks that they got to change policy but Biden is bound by their policy.

He just doesn’t get it. Perhaps we can help. Stephen says that Biden is “just wiping it all away.”

Ten-Four, Stephen. Biden is doing just that. This is why he is president.

Rather hilariously, Maria Bartiromo introduced Stephen by saying Stephen “also believes that Biden will destroy democracy.” Evidently, Maria believes Biden is the dictator that will overthrow the country, which is just precious. Biden has been in government for nearly fifty years and has managed to never once argue we shouldn’t be a democracy. Maria and Stephen clearly want their dictator.

Stephen freaked the fck out:

President Biden has already issued an astonishing number executive orders and actions in his first period of days, over 40, going around Congress, go around the legislature to unilaterally implement his own policy.

Even when that policy is flatly contradicted by duly enacted federal law. 

As an aside, we have all noticed something. We wonder why the GOP always includes the word “duly” unnecessarily. The “duly elected president.” “Duly enacted laws.” For some reason, they don’t find it cool enough to say “the president” or just “the law.”

Regardless, Stephen then went off in saying that Biden was “ending all immigration enforcement in America.” Interestingly, immigration enforcement is something the president does, just as Stephen decided to rip children away from parents – a policy that isn’t in the law – Stephen is upset that Biden won’t sufficiently punish asylum seekers.

Stephen was just getting warmed up:

Again and again and again, we’ve seen executive actions that aren’t just bad policy, but aren’t lawful. The fundamental question is this. What the point of having a Congress, a House, a Senate, committees going through detailed deliberations to pass federal laws where you debate every sentence, every comma, every paragraph if a president can come in and just wipe it all away and decide for himself what the law is?”

Oh for the love of god, just shut the “f” up, Steve. How many federal judges needed to throw your shit out without y’all giving a damn that it was illegal?

And now, Stephen doesn’t know WTF he’s talking about when delivering an embarrassing statement:

Once a law is passed, once a law is enacted, a future president can’t come in and delete whole or entire — whole portions or very large portions or any portion of that law!

If that was the case then what is the point? What is the point of spending years debating, deliberating, discussing, trading, reconciling — everything that goes into the legislative process?”

Stephen? Stephen? Calm down, okay? Because you’re a stupid stupid liar. Congress did not pass a single “immigration law” while you all were in office, get it? You did executive orders to change a lot of Obama policy. Executive orders can “trump” (bwahah) previous executive orders. Indeed, that’s precisely why we change presidents, Stephen. Again, Congress itself didn’t change a thing about immigration law.

Now let’s sit back and watch Stephen scramble the actual facts and law just as badly as he did when he first got into the administration and wrote the Muslim ban that every judge punted.

****
Peace, y’all
Jason
[email protected] and on Twitter @JasonMiciak