When you file as many lawsuits as pro-Trump attorney Lin Wood has filed, some of them in federal court hoping to get the case to the SCOTUS which can pronounce winners of elections just like they announced George W. Bush beat Al Gore (they didn’t, they just said they had to stop counting for the Electoral College), so Lin Wood does want the SCOTUS judging his cases. Given his plan, it’s a really bad idea to pretty much strike one justice out of your way, especially the flip-flopper Chief Justice, but Lin Wood has a plan. He is going to get Roberts nervous.

On Wednesday Lin Wood began his attack on the electric Twitter machine, going right at Chief Justice John Roberts, almost accusing Roberts of participating in some crazed conspiracy theory in which Justice Roberts had joined. This would explain how Roberts had an advanced warning of Justice Antonin Scalia’s death in 2016.

A couple of more questions for Chief Justice John Roberts:

(1) You are recorded discussing Justice Scalia’s successor before date of his sudden death. How did you know Scalia was going to die?

(2) Are you a member of any club or cabal requiring minor children as initiation fee? pic.twitter.com/jGxfgLCk4D

— Lin Wood (@LLinWood) December 31, 2020

Alright, let’s unpack this. “You are recorded discussing Justice Scalia’s successor before the date of his sudden death,” said Wood. “How did you know Scalia was going to die?”

That would seem to be significant evidence if it actually existed. Since Lin Wood seems to know, one would think that the attorney would produce it as evidence to the U.S. Attorney’s office or the FBI. We wonder why he has chosen not to do so. If there was evidence that Roberts knew when Scalia would die that would be interesting so again, we suggest he get that straight into the FBI.

We are not going into any club that is suggested here because even discussing it is wrong and promotes it.

Sounds like the Chief Justice is in for one rough ride just as soon as Lin Wood provides that evidence to someone. We’ll give Lin Wood a hint: a tweet on Parler is not evidence. We hope that helps.

****

Peace, y’all
Jason
[email protected]