Politics - News Analysis

Karoline Leavitt Refuses to Rule Out the Arrest of Supreme Court Judges Who Don’t Do What Trump Wants

In a move that could make even the most seasoned political cynic do a double-take, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt suggested that under President Donald Trump’s administration, even Supreme Court justices could be arrested if they obstruct federal law enforcement. This assertion followed the recent arrest of Wisconsin circuit court judge Hannah Dugan for allegedly impeding the FBI from detaining an undocumented immigrant in her courtroom.

When Fox News reporter Peter Doocy inquired whether the administration would consider arresting higher-ranking judges, including Supreme Court justices, Leavitt responded, “Anyone who is breaking the law or obstructing federal law enforcement officials is putting themselves at risk of being prosecuted, absolutely.” She added that such decisions would ultimately be up to the Department of Justice.

FBI Director Kash Patel posted a picture on X of Judge Hannah Dugan, the Milwaukee County Circuit judge who was arrested by the FBI on April 25.

Attorney General Pam Bondi echoed this sentiment, warning that judges who challenge or obstruct the administration’s immigration enforcement policies will be held accountable under the law. Her comments came after the arrests of two judges, including Judge Dugan, who was charged with obstructing federal proceedings and helping an undocumented immigrant evade Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

These developments underscore growing tensions between the Trump administration and the judiciary, particularly over immigration issues. President Trump has criticized federal judges who have blocked efforts to defund sanctuary cities and enforce voter ID requirements, even calling for the impeachment of Judge James Boasberg, who ordered the return of deported Venezuelan migrants.

As the administration continues to navigate these challenges, the debate over the balance of power between the executive branch and the judiciary remains a contentious issue.

Comments

Comments are currently closed.