Politics - News Analysis
Angry Trump Just Said the Military Should Further Punish LTC Vindman for Speaking Out Against Trump
Donald Trump suggested the military should consider additional disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who provided damaging testimony against Trump in the impeachment inquiry and was reassigned from his White House job last week.
“We sent him on his way to a much different location, and the military can handle him any way he wants,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.
Asked specifically if the Pentagon should pursue further action against Vindman, Trump said it would be “up to the military.”
“But if you look at what happened, they’re going to certainly, I would imagine, take a look at that,” he said.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
The president’s comments on Tuesday signaled he was open to additional punishment for officials who testified against him in the impeachment inquiry. Some of his allies have sought to cast the ouster of witnesses like Vindman as justifiable reassignments rather than retribution.
Trump added that there were more departures to come, but it was unclear if he was referring specifically to impeachment witnesses.
Trump says the military should look at disciplinary action against Lt. Col. Vindman, who gave testimony in impeachment hearings about the president pic.twitter.com/yX1ysfOMQ5
— Jeff Mason (@jeffmason1) February 11, 2020
Defense Secretary Mark Esper on Friday signaled there would be no punishment for Vindman, saying the Pentagon protects service members from retribution.
“We protect all of our persons, service members, from retribution or anything like that. We’ve already addressed that in policy and other means,” Esper told reporters at the Pentagon during a press conference with his Colombian counterpart.
Vindman had been working temporarily at the White House when he was dismissed.
WATCH:
Trump says the military should look at disciplining Lt. Col. Vindman for his Ukraine testimony.
"That will be up to the military. If you look at what happened, they are certainly — I would imagine take a look at that. But, no, I think what he did was reported a false call." pic.twitter.com/UgPvKS55uR
— Justin Baragona (@justinbaragona) February 11, 2020
Comments
Comments are currently closed.