Politics - News Analysis
Judge in Rittenhouse Trial Asks Entire Courtroom Including Jury to Clap For Defense Witness
How is this not an automatic mistrial?
There has been, to say the least, some consternation over the behavior of Judge Bruce Schroeder during the trial of Kyle Rittenhouse. He has given every indication that he already sides with the defendant in the case from Kenosha, Wisconsin, although judges are intended to be non-biased.
But after shouting at the prosecutor for trying to bring up Rittenhouse’s association with a white supremacist group, it was looking like Schroeder may have decided his opinion in advance. When he grilled the prosecution over the use of pictures of Kyle in court that depicted him in a bar celebrating his freedom after the events that took place in Kenosha, people began to question how this could possibly be happening in a fair trial.
Now, Schroeder has raised even more eyebrows, as he singled out a witness for Rittenhouse’s defense — so that the entire courtroom, including the jury, could give him a round of applause.
A reporter for the New York Times, Nick Bogel-Burroughs, tweeted a series of messages detailing how Judge Schroeder stopped the proceedings, asked if there were any veterans in the room, and upon finding out that there was only one — the next defense witness, Dr. John Black — asked everyone in attendance to “give a round of applause” to veterans. A group represented by one man. On the defense.
That it has nothing to do with the case is almost irrelevant. Neither is it pertinent that the judge asked if there were other veterans in the room prior to the call for applause.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
What is germane to the scenario is that any unbiased judge, upon seeing that the only person they were about to single out for praise was on the side of the defense, would have stopped themselves from asking even the jury to join him in applauding someone whose testimony hadn’t even been heard yet, on one side of the case.
How hard would it have been for Judge Schroeder to simply say, “Since it’s Veterans’ Day, I would like to thank all the present and former members of the armed forces here today” and be done with it?
And guess what: everyone clapped for the defense witness:
At the Kyle Rittenhouse trial this morning, the judge asked, given that it’s Veterans Day, if there were any veterans in the room.
The only one appeared to be Rittenhouse’s next witness, a use of force expert. So the judge asked everyone in the court to applaud for veterans. pic.twitter.com/LmjAuu5Vzj
— Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs (@NickAtNews) November 11, 2021
And the jurors clapped as well:
AP reporter @mtarm, who's in the courtroom and can see the jury, says the jurors applauded as well: https://t.co/Q7HYbOSAd1
— Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs (@NickAtNews) November 11, 2021
VIDEO:
— Nicholas Bogel-Burroughs (@NickAtNews) November 11, 2021
Twitter was disgusted:
IN FRONT OF THE JURORS!! https://t.co/qcC98eyQen
— Katie S. Phang (@KatiePhang) November 11, 2021
This was literally a plot point in the very bad, ludicrous '90s movie Runaway Jury, except it's the Pledge of Allegiance. https://t.co/WvddZ4lUKZ
— Ben Collins (@oneunderscore__) November 11, 2021
After they break for lunch, the judge will return to the bench wearing a red MAGA hat.
Prolly. https://t.co/fKAolnBcsV— Cheri Jacobus (@CheriJacobus) November 11, 2021
the first round of smart lawyer tweets about this trial were all like "this is actually all fine and normal" and now the judge is just initiating rounds of applause for defense witnesses lmao https://t.co/Z3km731MAp
— Law Boy, Esq. (@The_Law_Boy) November 11, 2021
Asking the court, including the jury, to applaud a defendant witness. Some world class judging. https://t.co/qI9jUiCrTp
— Don Moynihan (@donmoyn) November 11, 2021
I feel the way I felt when I watched Trial of the Chicago 7 and the judge was so nakedly biased that I literally Googled if he actually did that shit because it seemed so obviously illegal. What the fuck is going ON. https://t.co/AWDnD5jkwV
— ms. mauvais langue (@battymamzelle) November 11, 2021
How long does it take for an investigation into judicial misconduct to be carried out, because that's what this trial is. https://t.co/1bqiscEAQh
— Carolyn Hinds 🇧🇧 – Respect Black Women (@CarrieCnh12) November 11, 2021
Comments
Comments are currently closed.