Jack Smith is honing in on Donald Trump’s personal life and that includes his staff at Mar-a-Lago.

An exclusive report published by CNN speculates that support staff who were employed at his Florida residence and golf club after he served in the White House may be some of the potential witnesses that may be called in to testify at the criminal trial involving the mishandling of classified documents.

CNN interviewed numerous sources to verify that among the many folks who work at Mar-a-Lago that could possibly shed light on the questionable hoarding of documents marked “Classified” include a plumber, a maid, a chauffeur, a woodworker, and several maintenance workers, RawStory.

Smith’s team may also seek to question Trump’s Secret Service detail. former intelligence officials and people who were in a room with the former president when he discussed secret details about attacking Iran.

CNN hit a bump, however, and wasn’t able to figure out who knew what and when.

The woodworker, for instance, installed crown molding in Trump’s bedroom in February 2022, and apparently spotted a stack of papers, but it’s unclear if he could tell if the papers were classified.

“He thinks he saw things, doesn’t know what they were — he eventually told investigators he thought what he saw may be a movie prop,” one source who is knowledgeable about the investigation told CNN.

The maid in question cleaned Trump’s suite and the plumber spent several days a week working at Mar-a-Lago CNN reported, citing sources.

Investigators have apparently questioned a chauffeur about visits made by influential execs and VIPs, especially Australian billionaire Anthony Pratt. CNN’s report cites two sources who say Pratt may be called to testify because he has been at Mar-a-Lago and Trump potentially exposed Pratt to sensitive intel regarding U.S. nuclear submarines.

Discussing U.S. nuclear subs with your billionaire buddies doesn’t seem like appropriate dinner-table talk to me. The extent to which Trump has harmed this country is truly shocking. If he did do this, why did he even bring it up? What was the purpose of that?

But perhaps the even bigger question is this: What more harm will he do if he is reelected?