Politics - News Analysis
The Upcoming ‘Lecterngate’ Audit Is Going to Be Very, Very Bad for Sarah Huckabee Sanders
Remember when she faked like she paid someone twenty grand for a podium?
Sarah Huckabee Sanders, the current governor of Arkansas, has been embroiled in a pretty convoluted controversy.
Like all Republicans — in fact, like the actual former president is facing a criminal case for — Sanders has been trying to hide the money she gave from taxpayers to give to friends from the IRS.
But her latest attempt at hiding “her” finances” is absolutely pathetic.
Sanders paid $19,029 for a portable lectern that she could take with her on trips. But as ridiculous as that already sounds, the fixture in question is worth nowhere near that.
Even if the lectern had all the features Sanders claims it has, journalist Matt Campbell writes, which it doesn’t, it wouldn’t be worth almost 20 grand.
Stay up-to-date with the latest news!
Subscribe and start recieving our daily emails.
So the most optimal turnout for Sanders is that she actually gave Victoria Beckett, who provided it, all that money for a podium worth maybe a tenth that amount.
And once you see the podium and mentally compare what it even looks like at a GLANCE with the price paid for it, you know that Sanders has no business even dabbling in taxpayer money.
Like her father and her former boss (when she was Trump’s press secretary), Sarah simply can’t be trusted.
As Campbell points out later in his fascinating Twitter (X) thread, if the purchase of the lectern — a term I assume you’ve noticed I’m using interchangeably with “podium” for clarity’s sake — was legitimate, then it should have gotten tagged with an “inventory control number,” but it wasn’t.
But if the purchase was legitimate, then the “sale” of it (at taxpayer expense) to the Arkansas Republican Party was against the law.
If Sanders and the ARGOP lied about buying the podium for that much money just to give someone money that they were indebted to, like a donor, then it is on its face a felony.
But adding to the absurdity of the whole case, Sanders has time and time again acted as though there’s “nothing to see here.”
How is that an appropriate response to a situation that says you’re either an idiot or a thief?
If their lawyers are smart, they’ll say that the state Party “reimbursed” the state for the purchase, like it was for them all along. But Sarah admitted pretty early on in this proceeding that SHE wanted it, so thumbs down, lawyers.
Sarah Huckabee Sanders is about to have pretty awful week. This tweet thread explains it perfectly:
Something worth remembering as we wait for the #lecterngate audit report to be released: even the very best-case explanation is still bad for Sarah Sanders.
Let me explain… 🧵
(1/7) pic.twitter.com/DE7JVnd9E0— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
The best version for Sanders — b/c it's the only one not illegal on its face — is that the $19,029 actually went to Virginia Beckett for the lectern below.
Except, look at that thing. It's not worth $1,900, let alone $19,000. (2/7) pic.twitter.com/K5OjD5picl
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
Even if the pictured lectern had all the features that Sanders claims to have paid for, which it doesn't, anyone who paid over $19K for that has conclusively shown that they are too stupid to be trusted with state funds ever again.
But it's even worse than that. (3/7)
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
If they purchased that lectern, it should have received a state inventory control number & been subject to rules on disposal of state property. It did not.
Instead, if the purchase was legit, then the sale of the lectern to the ARGOP was illegal. (4/7)
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
After all, governor or not, Sanders cannot dispose of surplus state property however she chooses. There are laws and rules governing how that is done.
And, again, this is the best-case scenario for Sanders. Any other explanation is much worse. (5/7)
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
If they lied about buying a lectern to explain sending money to Beckett (still the most likely answer), or if they intentionally overpaid for a cheap lectern to funnel the excess payment somewhere, that's certainly worse b/c it's a clear felony. (6/7)
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
But when even the best possible explanation (a) makes you look too stupid to use a state credit card ever again and (b) opens a whole can of worms based on your subsequent actions, pretending like there's nothing to see here is a pretty absurd for Sanders to take. (7/7)
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
Postscript: One other thought, they may try to claim that the ARGOP "reimbursed" them, as if the lectern was always a purchase by the state for the ARGOP.
That's illegal on its face. Like, obviously that's not allowed. So feel free to mock anyone claiming such silliness.
— Matt Campbell (@BlueHogReport) April 11, 2024
Comments
Comments are currently closed.